Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) Exam
Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) Exam is a trademark of its owner, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Test Treasure Publication or TTP Prep.
Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) Exam is a trademark of its owner, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Test Treasure Publication or TTP Prep.
10 sample questions for the Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) Exam, with the correct answer and an explanation for each. No account needed. Try each one before you open the answer.
Sections covered on the exam: Coding Knowledge and Skills, Coding Documentation, Regulatory Compliance, Provider Queries, Information Technologies.
Question 1 · Coding Knowledge and Skills
Discharge summary: 78-year-old admitted with fever, productive cough, worsening dyspnea and 3+ leg edema. Chest x-ray: right lower lobe infiltrate. BNP markedly elevated. Treated with IV ceftriaxone and azithromycin and with IV furosemide. Final diagnoses: Right lower lobe pneumonia; acute on chronic diastolic heart failure. Both conditions were equally responsible for this admission and both required inpatient treatment.
Answer: B. Either the pneumonia or the heart failure may be sequenced first
When two or more interrelated or equally responsible conditions potentially meet the definition of principal diagnosis, either may be sequenced first unless the circumstances of admission, the therapy provided, or the Tabular List/Index indicate otherwise. Here the provider explicitly states both were equally responsible, so no query is needed; dyspnea is a symptom of the confirmed conditions and is not coded as principal.
Question 2 · Coding Documentation
Operative report: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, right. Three ports were placed. A 1.5 cm peripheral nodule in the right upper lobe was identified, and a wedge of lung tissue containing the nodule was removed with an endoscopic stapler. The remainder of the right upper lobe was left intact and expanded well.
Answer: C. Excision, percutaneous endoscopic approach
Only a portion of the right upper lobe was removed, so the root operation is Excision; Resection requires removal of all of a body part, and the upper lobe has its own body part value. The surgeon's use of the word "resection" does not determine the root operation. A thoracoscopic (VATS) procedure through ports is the percutaneous endoscopic approach, not open.
Question 3 · Regulatory Compliance
Attending progress note, day 2: Acute exacerbation of COPD. Continue nebulizers and IV steroids.
Pulmonology consult, day 2: PFTs show fully reversible obstruction. Impression: acute asthma exacerbation. No evidence of COPD.
Discharge summary (attending): Acute exacerbation of COPD, improved.
Answer: A. Query the attending to resolve the conflicting diagnoses
When the attending physician's documentation conflicts with a consultant's, the attending should be queried for clarification, because the attending is ultimately responsible for the final diagnostic statement. A consultant's opinion does not automatically override the attending. Coding both would report contradictory conditions, and dropping the exacerbation ignores documentation.
Question 4 · Provider Queries
Query drafted by CDI specialist to Dr. Ortiz: "Patient admitted with COPD exacerbation. SpO2 86% on room air, respiratory rate 30, ABG pO2 54 mmHg, placed on BiPAP. Documenting acute respiratory failure would raise the DRG relative weight and improve our severity-of-illness profile. Please clarify the condition being treated: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; hypoxemia without respiratory failure; other (please specify); clinically undetermined."
Answer: B. Remove the sentence about the DRG weight and severity profile
Compliant query guidelines prohibit stating the impact a response would have on reimbursement, DRG, or quality measures, so that sentence must go. The clinical indicators (SpO2, RR, ABG, BiPAP) belong in the query, and the multiple-choice options with other and clinically undetermined are appropriate; converting to yes/no for an undocumented diagnosis would make it leading.
Question 5 · Information Technologies
Compliance audit summary: For two years, the billing office submitted claims using a default modifier set up in the billing system. Staff never checked whether it applied, despite repeated payer denial notices explaining the error. No one intended to defraud the government.
Answer: A. Liability can apply, since acting in reckless disregard of the truth meets the knowing standard
The civil False Claims Act defines "knowingly" to include actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance and reckless disregard of the truth, and expressly requires no proof of specific intent to defraud. Ignoring repeated notices of an error can meet that standard, and claims generated by software remain the submitter's responsibility.
Question 6 · Coding Knowledge and Skills
Discharge summary: Patient with multiple myeloma, not in remission, admitted with fatigue and hemoglobin of 6.8 g/dL. Diagnosis: Symptomatic anemia due to the multiple myeloma (anemia in neoplastic disease). Transfused 2 units of packed red cells. No treatment directed at the myeloma was given during this stay.
Answer: A. Multiple myeloma, then anemia in neoplastic disease
When the admission is for management of anemia associated with the malignancy and treatment is only for the anemia, the malignancy is sequenced as the principal diagnosis, followed by the code for anemia in neoplastic disease. This differs from anemia due to chemotherapy (an adverse effect), where the anemia is sequenced first.
Question 7 · Coding Documentation
Operative report: Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis. A hand port was placed through a 7 cm periumbilical incision and laparoscopic ports were added. The entire sigmoid colon was mobilized and removed, and a stapled colorectal anastomosis was created.
Answer: A. Resection, open approach
The sigmoid colon has its own body part value and all of it was removed, so the root operation is Resection rather than Excision of the large intestine. Guideline B5.2a states that procedures performed with the open approach with percutaneous endoscopic assistance, or hand-assisted laparoscopy, are coded to the open approach.
Question 8 · Regulatory Compliance
Cardiology consult, day 1: Troponin 0.09. Possible NSTEMI; trend troponins.
Cardiology follow-up, day 2: Troponins flat at 0.08-0.09. Not an MI. Demand ischemia due to atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.
Discharge summary (attending): Atrial fibrillation with RVR, rate controlled. Demand ischemia; NSTEMI ruled out.
Answer: B. Atrial fibrillation and demand ischemia
The early possible NSTEMI was later ruled out by the consultant, and the attending's discharge summary agrees, so there is no conflict to query. Inpatient uncertain diagnoses are coded only when still uncertain at discharge; a ruled-out condition is not coded. Demand ischemia was diagnosed and evaluated and is reported with the atrial fibrillation.
Question 9 · Provider Queries
Discharge summary: Sepsis due to cellulitis of left lower leg, treated with oral cephalexin. Discharged day 2.
| Measure | Admission | Day 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 37.4 C | 37.0 C |
| Heart rate | 84 | 78 |
| Respiratory rate | 16 | 16 |
| WBC | 9,200 | 8,100 |
| Lactate | 1.0 mmol/L | not drawn |
Answer: A. Send a clinical validation query presenting these findings and asking the provider to confirm or rule out sepsis
When a documented diagnosis appears to lack clinical support, the compliant step is a clinical validation query that presents the indicators and lets the provider confirm, rule out, or otherwise clarify the diagnosis. The coder may not remove a provider-documented diagnosis on the coder's own judgment, and a query that tells the provider which diagnosis to document is leading.
Question 10 · Coding Knowledge and Skills
Query response from attending: "Stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer first noted by wound nurse 20 hours after admission. Patient arrived from home with limited skin assessment in ED. I am clinically unable to determine whether it was present at the time of admission."
Answer: B. W, which is treated like Y, so the ulcer can still act as an MCC
When the provider states that it is clinically impossible to determine whether a condition was present on admission, POA indicator W applies, and CMS pays W like Y for HAC purposes. U is for documentation that is insufficient to determine POA status and is treated like N; here the provider answered the query, so the documentation is not insufficient.
TTP Prep has 200 Certified Coding Specialist practice questions with explanations, timed and mock-exam modes, 134 flashcards, interactive lessons, a printable cheat sheet and a readiness score. Start free, no card needed.
More free questions: browse every exam.