Praxis PLT: Grades 5-9 (5623)

1. Question 1 · Students As Learners

   Ms. Nakamura's seventh-grade ELA class is preparing two-minute persuasive speeches. Zoe, a strong writer, asks to give her speech only to the teacher at lunch. She explains that she has a small rash on her chin and that 'everyone will be staring at it the whole time.' No classmate has mentioned the rash. Zoe's concern is best explained by which of the following?

   • A.The personal fable, a belief that one's experiences are unique and that one is invulnerable
   • B.The imaginary audience, a belief that others are as focused on one's appearance as oneself
   • C.Identity foreclosure, a commitment to a self-image adopted without any exploration
   • D.Preoperational egocentrism, an inability to take any point of view other than one's own
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: B. The imaginary audience, a belief that others are as focused on one's appearance as oneself

   Elkind's imaginary audience describes young adolescents' sense that peers are watching and judging them as closely as they judge themselves, which fits Zoe's certainty that everyone will stare at a rash no one has noticed. The personal fable is Elkind's other construct, but it centers on feeling unique or invulnerable rather than on being watched.

2. Question 2 · Students As Learners

   At one middle school, students with disabilities spend most of the day in a special education classroom and join general classes such as art and PE when they can keep up with little support. At a second middle school, students with disabilities are full members of general education classes, and special educators co-teach and bring supports into those classes. Which of the following best describes the difference between the two schools?

   • A.The first follows the least restrictive environment rule; the second does not.
   • B.The first school reflects mainstreaming, and the second reflects inclusion.
   • C.Both reflect full inclusion and differ only in how classes are scheduled.
   • D.The first school reflects inclusion, and the second reflects mainstreaming.
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: B. The first school reflects mainstreaming, and the second reflects inclusion.

   Mainstreaming places students with disabilities in general classes when they can manage with little support, while inclusion makes the general class the home base and brings supports to the student. IDEA's least restrictive environment requirement favors education with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate, so the second school does not violate it.

3. Question 3 · Instructional Process

   A ninth-grade ELA teacher is preparing for a Socratic seminar on an essay that argues cities should set curfews for teenagers. In past class discussions, students mostly answered the teacher's questions one at a time and rarely responded to one another. Which teacher role during the seminar is most consistent with the purpose of this strategy?

   • A.Call on students in seating order so that each student answers one teacher question during class
   • B.Give a short lecture on the essay's argument so that the discussion begins with accurate ideas
   • C.Ask a series of factual questions about the essay and confirm each correct answer for the class
   • D.Pose an open-ended opening question, then step back so students build on one another's ideas
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: D. Pose an open-ended opening question, then step back so students build on one another's ideas

   A Socratic seminar is a student-centered discussion in which the teacher facilitates with open-ended questions and students respond to one another using the text as evidence. A string of factual questions keeps the teacher at the center and repeats the question-answer pattern the teacher wants to break.

4. Question 4 · Assessment

   Mr. Haddad plans a four-week argumentative writing unit for his eighth-grade English class of 28 students. His assessment plan: Day 1: Students write a short on-demand argument on a familiar school issue. It is not graded; he reads it before teaching the unit. Weeks 1-2: Short exit tickets at the end of lessons on argument structure. Week 3: Students exchange drafts and complete a peer-review checklist. Week 4: Students submit a final essay scored with a rubric; the score counts toward the quarter grade. WEEK 2 EXIT TICKET RESULTS (28 STUDENTS) Skill checked Students correct Identify the writer's claim 26 Identify relevant evidence for the claim 24 Write a counterclaim and a rebuttal 10 Mr. Haddad's Day 1 on-demand writing task serves primarily as which type of assessment?

   • A.Benchmark, comparing students with peers across the district each term
   • B.Norm-referenced, ranking each student against a national sample
   • C.Diagnostic, showing what students can already do before instruction
   • D.Summative, documenting what students achieved by the end of the unit
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: C. Diagnostic, showing what students can already do before instruction

   An ungraded task given before teaching to find out students' existing skills is diagnostic; its job is to shape the plan for the unit. It is not summative, because it comes before instruction and does not count toward a grade, and nothing in it compares students with a district or national group.

5. Question 5 · Development

   Case history. A middle school opened an optional after-school homework center staffed by teachers. Students decide for themselves whether to attend. At the end of the first semester, the eighth-grade team reviews the data below during a team meeting. One teacher says, "This proves the center works. We should require every struggling student to attend." EIGHTH-GRADE FIRST-SEMESTER MATH GRADES Number of Mean semester Group students grade Attended the center at 42 84 least twice a week Attended rarely or never 118 76 Based on the data, which conclusion is best supported?

   • A.The center raised math grades by eight points, so attendance should become required for all eighth graders
   • B.Attenders earned higher grades, but because students chose to attend, the center may not explain the gap
   • C.The data cannot be used at all, because the two groups have different numbers of students in them
   • D.The center did not help, because fewer than half of the eighth graders chose to attend it during the semester
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: B. Attenders earned higher grades, but because students chose to attend, the center may not explain the gap

   The data show an association, not a cause: students who choose to stay after school may already be more motivated, organized, or supported at home, and those traits could produce higher grades on their own. Concluding that the center caused an eight-point gain ignores this self-selection, and unequal group sizes do not by themselves make the comparison meaningless.

6. Question 6 · Students As Learners

   Mr. Brennan's sixth-grade science class is beginning a unit on seasons. Many students studied the topic in fifth grade and can still recite that 'Earth's axis is tilted.' On a pre-assessment, he asks, 'Why is it warmer in summer than in winter?' PRE-ASSESSMENT RESPONSES (27 STUDENTS) Number of Explanation given students Earth is closer to the sun in summer 22 Tilt changes how directly sunlight strikes 3 Earth Other or no answer 2 Which of the following best explains why so many students still explain the seasons by distance after earlier instruction?

   • A.They have not yet reached the concrete operational stage needed for science concepts.
   • B.They fit the new term into an existing intuitive schema without changing that schema.
   • C.They lacked the reading skills needed to understand the fifth- grade materials.
   • D.They forgot the fifth-grade lesson because it was not followed by tangible rewards.
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: B. They fit the new term into an existing intuitive schema without changing that schema.

   Misconceptions persist when learners assimilate new words into an existing everyday model, closer means hotter, instead of restructuring it. Sixth graders are typically concrete operational or beyond, so a missing stage does not explain the error.

7. Question 7 · Students As Learners

   Seventh grader Kalani, who has autism, becomes upset during a read-aloud when a character says, 'Hold your horses,' and asks why there are no horses in the story. Earlier, he was confused when his teacher said the quiz would be 'a piece of cake.' Which of the following would best support Kalani?

   • A.Ask him to infer idiom meanings from context clues on his own during reading
   • B.Avoid assigning any texts that contain figurative language for the rest of the year
   • C.Explicitly teach common idioms with examples and use literal wording for directions
   • D.Have him memorize a long list of idioms and definitions before each new novel
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: C. Explicitly teach common idioms with examples and use literal wording for directions

   Many students with autism interpret language literally, so direct instruction in figurative expressions, along with clear literal directions, supports both comprehension and daily functioning. Independent inference from context is the very skill he is struggling with, so expecting it without instruction does not help.

8. Question 8 · Instructional Process

   After a pre-assessment on chemical reactions, an eighth-grade science teacher gives three groups the same goal, explaining conservation of mass, but different tasks. One group balances simple equations using manipulatives, one balances equations independently, and one designs a closed-system experiment to compare mass before and after a reaction. This arrangement is an example of

   • A.a jigsaw in which groups teach their tasks to others
   • B.a tiered assignment differentiated by readiness
   • C.curriculum compacting for students who show mastery
   • D.a learning contract negotiated with each student
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: B. a tiered assignment differentiated by readiness

   Tiered assignments keep the same essential learning goal while varying the complexity of the task according to readiness data, here from the pre-assessment. Curriculum compacting would let students who have already mastered content skip it in favor of other work, not give every group a version of the same goal.

9. Question 9 · Assessment

   Mr. Benali's ninth-grade physical science students work in groups of three to design and run an experiment testing one factor that might affect the time a pendulum takes to swing. Each student then writes an individual lab report. While groups work, he circulates with a clipboard and takes notes. His draft scoring rubric: PENDULUM LAB RUBRIC (DRAFT) Criterion 4 3 2 1 Hypothesis Excellent Good Fair Poor Controlling variables Excellent Good Fair Poor Data table and graph Excellent Good Fair Poor Conclusion Excellent Good Fair Poor Which revision would most improve the usefulness and consistency of Mr. Benali's rubric?

   • A.Expand the rating scale to six levels so that he can make finer distinctions in quality
   • B.Combine the four criteria into one overall score for the entire lab report
   • C.Add a fifth criterion for neatness and on-time submission of the lab report
   • D.Describe the observable features of the work at each level of every criterion
   Show answer and explanation

   Answer: D. Describe the observable features of the work at each level of every criterion

   Labels such as "Good" and "Fair" do not say what the work looks like, so scorers may disagree and students cannot tell how to improve; descriptors of observable features fix both problems. Adding levels to vague labels only multiplies the guesswork, and a neatness criterion adds something unrelated to the science learning goals.

10. Question 10 · Development

    Case history. A seventh-grade science teacher, Mr. Oduya, wants to know whether short, low-stakes retrieval quizzes at the start of class improve learning. During a unit on cells, he gives the quizzes three times a week in his Period 2 class but not in his Period 5 class. Both classes receive the same lessons and take the same pretest and unit test. MEAN SCORES (PERCENT CORRECT) Class Students Pretest Unit test Gain Period 2 (quizzes) 27 58 78 20 Period 5 (no quizzes) 29 66 80 14 Based on the data, which conclusion is best supported?

    • A.The quizzes had no effect, because the two classes finished the unit with similar unit test scores
    • B.Period 2 gained more, which is consistent with a quiz benefit but is not yet strong evidence of one
    • C.Period 5 learned more during the unit, because its students earned the higher unit test average
    • D.The quizzes caused a gain of six extra points, so every science teacher in the school should begin using them
    Show answer and explanation

    Answer: B. Period 2 gained more, which is consistent with a quiz benefit but is not yet strong evidence of one

    Because the classes started at different levels, gains are the fairer comparison, and Period 2 gained 20 points versus 14. With only two intact, nonrandom classes and one unit, other differences between the groups could explain the gap, so the result is suggestive rather than proof of a six-point causal effect.

More free questions: browse every exam.