Foundations of Deaf Education · 5 min read
Historical Perspectives in Deaf Education
The history of deaf education in the United States provides essential context for understanding current practices, philosophies, and ongoing debates in the field. Understanding this history helps educators appreciate how educational approaches have evolved and why certain controversies persist today.
Early History and European Influences
Formal deaf education began in Europe during the 16th century. Pedro Ponce de León, a Spanish Benedictine monk, is credited as one of the first teachers of deaf students. He developed methods to teach deaf children of Spanish nobility to speak, read, and write. His work demonstrated that deaf individuals could be educated, challenging prevailing beliefs that deaf people were incapable of learning.
In France, Abbé Charles-Michel de l'Épée established the first free public school for deaf students in Paris in 1760. He developed a system of methodical signs based on French Sign Language used by the Deaf community in Paris. His approach emphasized visual communication and became known as the French method or manual method. L'Épée's school trained teachers who would later influence deaf education worldwide.
Samuel Heinicke established the first state-supported school for deaf students in Germany in 1778. Unlike l'Épée, Heinicke emphasized oral instruction, teaching deaf students to speak and lip-read without using signs. This approach became known as the German method or oral method. The philosophical differences between the French and German approaches established a debate that continues today.
American Deaf Education Beginnings
American deaf education formally began in 1817 when Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet and Laurent Clerc established the American School for the Deaf in Hartford, Connecticut. Gallaudet, an American minister, had traveled to Europe to learn methods of deaf education. He visited the Braidwood schools in England, which used oral methods, but was unable to learn their techniques due to their secretive practices. He then traveled to Paris, where he studied under Abbé Sicard at the Institution for Deaf-Mutes and met Laurent Clerc, a deaf teacher.
Clerc agreed to return to America with Gallaudet to help establish a school. Together, they founded the Connecticut Asylum for the Education and Instruction of Deaf and Dumb Persons, later renamed the American School for the Deaf. The school used a combination of French Sign Language and home signs that American deaf students had developed, which eventually evolved into American Sign Language.
The success of the Hartford school led to the establishment of residential schools for deaf students throughout the United States. These schools became centers of Deaf culture and community, where deaf students could interact with deaf peers and deaf adults. The residential school model dominated American deaf education for much of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The Oral-Manual Controversy
The most significant controversy in deaf education history involves the debate between oral and manual methods of instruction. The oral method emphasizes teaching deaf students to speak and lip-read, with the goal of integrating them into hearing society. The manual method uses sign language as the primary mode of instruction and communication.
Alexander Graham Bell became a prominent advocate for oral education. Bell, whose mother and wife were deaf, believed that deaf individuals should learn to speak to participate fully in hearing society. He opposed the use of sign language in schools and advocated for the mainstreaming of deaf students in public schools. Bell also expressed concerns about the formation of a deaf variety of the human race through intermarriage among deaf individuals.
The Milan Conference of 1880 marked a turning point in deaf education history. At this international congress of educators of the deaf, delegates voted to declare oral methods superior to manual methods. The resolution stated that oral education should be the preferred method and that simultaneous use of signs and speech was harmful to speech development and lip-reading. Following this conference, many schools in Europe and America banned the use of sign language in classrooms.
The oral-only approach dominated deaf education for approximately a century following the Milan Conference. During this period, many deaf students were forbidden from using sign language in school, and deaf teachers were often removed from teaching positions. Research later demonstrated that many deaf students educated under strict oral methods had poor literacy outcomes and limited academic achievement.
The Rise of Total Communication
By the 1960s and 1970s, research began documenting the limited success of oral-only education for many deaf students. Studies showed that the average deaf high school graduate read at approximately a third or fourth-grade level. This recognition led to the development of Total Communication, an educational philosophy that emerged in the late 1960s.
Total Communication advocated for the use of all available means of communication, including speech, signs, fingerspelling, lipreading, writing, and amplification. The philosophy emphasized flexibility and individualization, recognizing that different students might benefit from different communication approaches. Total Communication became widely adopted in American deaf education programs during the 1970s and 1980s.
However, Total Communication was criticized for often resulting in simultaneous communication, where teachers spoke and signed at the same time. Critics argued that simultaneous communication resulted in incomplete representation of both English and ASL, as the two languages have different grammatical structures. This criticism led to the development of bilingual-bicultural approaches.
Bilingual-Bicultural Education
The bilingual-bicultural approach, often abbreviated as Bi-Bi, emerged in the 1980s and 1990s. This approach treats ASL as the first language of deaf children and English as a second language. Proponents argue that deaf children should develop fluency in ASL first, then learn English through reading and writing, with ASL serving as the bridge language.
The Bi-Bi approach also emphasizes the importance of Deaf culture and identity. Advocates argue that deaf children should have access to deaf adults, deaf peers, and Deaf cultural experiences. The approach views deafness not as a disability to be remediated but as a difference to be respected.
Deaf President Now Movement
The Deaf President Now protest at Gallaudet University in 1988 represented a significant moment in deaf history and had implications for deaf education. When the university's Board of Trustees selected a hearing president over two qualified deaf candidates, students and faculty shut down the campus in protest. After eight days, the board appointed I. King Jordan as the university's first deaf president.
The Deaf President Now movement increased visibility and pride in Deaf culture. It demonstrated the capabilities of deaf individuals and challenged assumptions about deaf people's limitations. The movement influenced attitudes toward deaf education and strengthened advocacy for bilingual-bicultural approaches.
Finished reading?
Lock it in with a quick Foundations of Deaf Education quiz.