TExES Principal as Instructional Leader (268)
TExES Principal as Instructional Leader (268) is a trademark of its owner, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Test Treasure Publication or TTP Prep.
TExES Principal as Instructional Leader (268) is a trademark of its owner, which is not affiliated with and does not endorse Test Treasure Publication or TTP Prep.
10 sample questions for the TExES Principal as Instructional Leader (268), with the correct answer and an explanation for each. No account needed. Try each one before you open the answer.
Sections covered on the exam: School Environment, Human Capital, Ethics.
Question 1 · School Environment
Answer: A. The widest gap concerns whether rules are applied fairly, so discipline consistency should be examined first.
Subtracting student agreement from teacher agreement shows the largest gap on fair application of rules (86% versus 41%, a 45-point difference), larger than safety (39), caring (33), challenging work (22), or communication (13). That gap signals a perception problem worth investigating through discipline data and student voice. Parents are not the least satisfied group; their average agreement (70%) exceeds the students' (about 57%). Challenging work actually earned the highest student agreement, and communication shows the smallest student-teacher gap. Using disaggregated perception data to set priorities reflects Competency 001's emphasis on a data-informed, positive campus culture.
Question 2 · Human Capital
Answer: C. Because about half of each class is below benchmark, the first priority is strengthening Tier 1 core reading instruction for all students.
In an effective MTSS, core (Tier 1) instruction should meet the needs of roughly 80% of students. When about half of every class is below benchmark, the problem is systemic, and adding intervention alone cannot close a gap that large. Strengthening core instruction is the first priority. Mass special education referrals misread a system-level pattern as individual disability. The differences among classes are small (45% to 52%), so singling out one teacher is not supported. Replacing core instruction with intervention reduces access to grade-level content. Competency 003 includes implementing MTSS/RTI to meet the needs of all students.
Question 3 · Human Capital
| Student | Sessions scheduled | Sessions attended | Growth vs. target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 30 | 29 | Meeting target | |
| B | 30 | 27 | Meeting target | |
| C | 30 | 11 | Below target | Speech therapy at same time |
| D | 30 | 10 | Below target | Speech therapy at same time |
| E | 30 | 9 | Below target | Dyslexia services at same time |
| F | 30 | 8 | Below target | Dyslexia services at same time |
Answer: D. Resolve the schedule conflicts that are keeping several students from attending most of their sessions.
Before judging an intervention ineffective, leaders must confirm that students actually received it. Students C, D, E, and F attended only 8 to 11 of 30 scheduled sessions because of conflicts with speech therapy and dyslexia services, and they are the students below target; Students A and B attended nearly every session and are meeting the target. The data point to an access problem, not a program problem. Replacing the program or referring students would misread insufficient dosage as nonresponse. Extending the intervention without fixing the schedule repeats the same barrier. Competency 004 includes monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of interventions.
Question 4 · Human Capital
| Walkthrough focus: checking for understanding | Teachers observed (n = 28) |
|---|---|
| Rarely checks for understanding during lessons | 6 |
| Checks for understanding but does not adjust instruction | 15 |
| Checks for understanding and adjusts instruction effectively | 7 |
Answer: C. Differentiate PD: responding to check data for the 15, basic checking techniques for the six, and facilitator roles for the seven
The data reveal three distinct groups, and the largest (15 teachers) already checks for understanding but does not adjust instruction. Differentiating professional learning by need, with the seven skilled teachers serving as models or facilitators, gives each group its next step. A campuswide session on basic techniques repeats what 22 teachers already do. Focusing only on the six teachers ignores the largest need. Preference surveys can inform planning but should not replace direct evidence of instructional needs.
Question 5 · School Environment
Answer: D. Inventory the initiatives with staff, judge each by goal alignment and impact, and consolidate or cut the weakest
Systems thinking recognizes that too many overlapping initiatives compete for teachers' time and dilute implementation of all of them. Inventorying initiatives with staff and evaluating each against campus goals and evidence of impact allows the principal to consolidate and focus the work. Keeping everything perpetuates the overload. Cutting all but two based on personal judgment ignores data and staff input and may eliminate effective or required programs. Distributing ownership spreads responsibility but leaves teachers carrying the same number of initiatives.
Question 6 · School Environment
Answer: B. Weak implementation of the advisory intervention likely explains the flat results for intervention students, so it has not been fairly tested.
Progress monitoring must examine implementation alongside outcomes. Only about half of planned sessions were held and attendance fell to 39%, so intervention students barely received the strategy; their flat results say little about whether it works. Declaring the intervention ineffective skips this fidelity check. The PLC strategy appears to be working, since non-intervention students rose from 57% to 65%. Lowering the target reduces expectations before the campus has corrected an implementation problem it controls (Competency 001: using data to monitor progress and adjust plans toward the vision).
Question 7 · Human Capital
| Feeder middle school | Ninth graders who passed Grade 8 math | Failing Algebra I at end of first semester |
|---|---|---|
| Oak Hill MS | 212 | 9% |
| Westfield MS | 188 | 31% |
| Pine Creek MS | 143 | 11% |
Answer: D. Work with Westfield's principal so Grade 8 math and Algebra I teachers can compare curriculum maps, TEKS emphasis, and student work.
The data isolate the problem to one feeder: Westfield students fail at roughly three times the rate of students from the other campuses despite having passed Grade 8 math. That pattern points to a vertical alignment gap, such as differences in emphasis on foundational TEKS, which teachers from both campuses can identify by comparing maps and student work. Double-blocking every Westfield student treats the symptom and ignores individual readiness. A summer program for all students is broader than the problem. Slowing pacing for everyone lowers expectations and risks leaving part of the Algebra I curriculum untaught.
Question 8 · Human Capital
Answer: B. Map each assessment item to its TEKS student expectation and cognitive demand, and revise or add items where they do not match.
Curriculum-assessment alignment requires that assessments measure both the content and the level of thinking the TEKS require. Mapping each item to its student expectation and cognitive demand reveals where recall items stand in for analysis and evaluation, so the team can revise them. Released state forms cover the whole course and are not designed to measure a single unit as it is taught. Adding more recall items makes a misaligned measure more consistent but no more valid. A single end-of-semester essay comes too late to inform instruction during each unit.
Question 9 · Human Capital
Answer: D. Focus each round of feedback on one evidence-based, high-leverage action step the teacher can practice before the next visit.
Feedback changes practice when it is specific, evidence-based, timely, and manageable. A single high-leverage action step that the teacher can rehearse and then be observed using is far more actionable than a long list. Attaching ratings to each suggestion makes walkthroughs feel evaluative without making the advice more usable. A monthly summary sacrifices timeliness. Withholding all growth-oriented feedback avoids the problem; trust is built through feedback that is useful, not only positive (Competency 005).
Question 10 · School Environment
Answer: D. Review all current initiatives against campus goals and stop or merge those that overlap or lack results before launching.
Successful change management requires focus. Auditing existing initiatives and stopping or integrating those that are redundant or ineffective frees capacity and signals that the new strategy is a priority aligned with campus goals. Delaying monitoring does not reduce the overload. Launching everywhere at once is not a pilot and adds to fatigue. Letting each teacher choose initiatives fragments the campus's efforts and makes coherent implementation and evaluation impossible (Competency 008).
TTP Prep has 200 TExES 268 practice questions with explanations, timed and mock-exam modes, 153 flashcards, interactive lessons, a printable cheat sheet and a readiness score. Start free, no card needed.
More free questions: browse every exam.