Oral and Written Language Development · 6 min read
Language Development and Second Language Acquisition
Some questions test adult-level knowledge, such as identifying a complex sentence or matching a theorist to a claim. Others ask for the best classroom activity, adaptation for an English learner or exceptional learner, or next step after an assessment. The strongest answer is usually developmentally appropriate, builds on what children know, and uses assessment to guide instruction.
This chapter covers Competency 0001: the bases of communication, theories of first and second language acquisition, and how listening, speaking, reading, and writing relate.
Components of Language
Five Components of Language
| Component | What It Governs | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Phonology | Sound system and patterns | Hearing that "cat" and "hat" rhyme |
| Morphology | Meaningful word parts | Adding -ed or un- to change meaning |
| Syntax | Word order and sentence structure | "The dog chased the ball," not "Ball the chased dog" |
| Semantics | Meaning of words and sentences | Knowing "bat" can be an animal or sports gear |
| Pragmatics | Social use of language | Taking turns; using a quieter voice in the library |
A preschooler who says "I goed to the park" is showing growth in morphology, not a lack of it. The child has learned the regular past-tense rule and is applying it to an irregular verb. This overgeneralization (overregularization) shows that children construct rules rather than simply imitate.
Common Trap: Pragmatics is social use, not sounds or grammar. A child who speaks in correct sentences but interrupts constantly, stands too close, or uses the same tone with friends and adults has a pragmatic need, not a syntax or articulation need.
Theories of First Language Acquisition
Match each theory to its central claim and a classroom implication. Modern practice blends them.
Major Theories of Language Development
| Theory and Figure | Central Claim | Classroom Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Behaviorist (B. F. Skinner) | Language is learned through imitation and reinforcement | Model correct forms; reinforce attempts |
| Nativist (Noam Chomsky) | Children are born with a language acquisition device (LAD) and universal grammar | Expect natural rule-building and errors like "goed" |
| Cognitive (Jean Piaget) | Language follows cognitive development through stages | Match language demands to the child's thinking stage |
| Sociocultural (Lev Vygotsky) | Language and thought develop through social interaction in the zone of proximal development (ZPD) | Scaffold through talk with adults and capable peers |
| Interactionist (Jerome Bruner) | Adults provide a language acquisition support system (LASS) through routines | Use predictable routines, repeated shared reading, scaffolding |
Behaviorism cannot explain novel forms no one modeled, such as "two mouses"; nativism explains them but says little about environment. Piaget treated a child's talking aloud to no one as egocentric speech that fades; Vygotsky saw the same private speech as a self-regulation tool that later becomes inner speech. Bruner, with colleagues, introduced the term scaffolding.
The ZPD is the gap between what a child can do alone and what the child can do with help. Scaffolding is temporary support (modeling, prompts, sentence starters, think-alouds) that is gradually removed as the child gains independence.
Second Language Acquisition
Stephen Krashen's monitor model has five hypotheses.
Teachers make input comprehensible with visuals, gestures, and realia, and lower the affective filter by honoring the silent period, avoiding public correction, and using partner talk before whole-class sharing.
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
| Stage | Learner Behavior | Effective Prompts |
|---|---|---|
| Preproduction (silent period) | Listens, points, follows gestures; little speech | "Show me..." "Point to..." |
| Early production | One- or two-word answers; memorized phrases | Yes/no and either/or questions |
| Speech emergence | Simple sentences; frequent errors | "Why?" "How?" with sentence frames |
| Intermediate fluency | Longer, more complex sentences | "What would happen if...?" |
| Advanced fluency | Near-native academic use | Continued academic vocabulary support |
Common Trap: The silent period is a normal stage, not evidence of a disability or defiance. Forcing a beginning English learner to speak before the class raises the affective filter. The best answer lets the student respond nonverbally while receiving rich comprehensible input.
BICS, CALP, and Transfer
Jim Cummins distinguished basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS), the conversational language of the playground, which typically develop in about one to three years, from cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP), the language of textbooks and tests ("compare," "therefore," "evaporation"), which typically takes five to seven years or more.
Worked Example: A third grader who arrived eighteen months ago chats easily with classmates but scores far below grade level on a science unit test. What is the most likely explanation?
Fluent conversation shows developed BICS.
The test requires academic vocabulary and complex structures, which are CALP.
Eighteen months is typical for BICS but far short of the typical time for CALP.
Result: The student is still developing academic language and needs academic language support, not an assumption of a learning problem.
Cummins also described common underlying proficiency: concepts and literacy skills transfer across languages, so a child who understands photosynthesis in Spanish needs the English label, not the concept retaught. Positive transfer occurs where languages share features, such as cognates (familia and family). Negative transfer (interference) occurs where they differ, such as a Spanish speaker writing "the car red" because adjectives usually follow nouns in Spanish.
Home Language as an Asset
Students who keep developing their first language tend to build stronger English literacy. Teachers invite families to share stories, provide bilingual books, point out cognates, and let students discuss ideas in the home language before writing in English.
Exam Tip: An answer choice advising families to use only English at home is almost always wrong. Choices that build on home language and cultural knowledge are usually correct.
How the Four Language Domains Connect
The Four Language Domains
| Receptive | Expressive | |
|---|---|---|
| Oral | Listening | Speaking |
| Written | Reading | Writing |
Oral language is the foundation for literacy: a child cannot comprehend a printed word that is not in the child's listening vocabulary, and listening comprehension usually exceeds reading comprehension through the elementary grades. That is why read-alouds above students' reading level build vocabulary and background knowledge. Effective oral language instruction builds on children's prior knowledge, experiences, and interests; before a read-aloud about farms, a teacher in a city school might ask children where their food comes from and introduce key words with photographs.
Key Takeaways
The components of language are phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics; overgeneralization errors show rule learning.
Skinner (reinforcement), Chomsky (LAD), Piaget (cognitive stages), Vygotsky (social interaction, ZPD), Bruner (scaffolding, LASS).
Krashen's input and affective filter hypotheses call for comprehensible input in a low-anxiety classroom.
BICS takes about one to three years; CALP about five to seven. Conversational fluency is not academic proficiency.
Oral language is the foundation of reading and writing.
Study coach
Ask about this chapter
Answers come only from “Language Development and Second Language Acquisition”. If the chapter doesn't cover it, the coach will say so.
Finished reading?
Lock it in with a quick Oral and Written Language Development quiz.